Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Does UNcarrier 3.0 involve the acquisition of Sprint?

(photo credit:

When referencing to the possibility of there being room for a Larger #3 merger, could T-Mobile's CFO, Braxton Carter have been hinting at a T-Mobile/Sprint Merger?  that would certainly solidify its LTE presence.  Sprint's customers would be sympathetic to a T-Mobile since most of its customers are price sensitive, value oriented, and data hungry.  This would make room for a new #4 competitor in the value market.... Hmmmm... AT&T's Aio Wireless?.... 

The scenario is looking pretty promising.  Is that part of Phase 3 of Magenta's UNcarrier campaign... superfast growth through an acquisition of Competitor #3?  

If you take notice, T-Mobile has been after AT&T and Verizon quite agressively while not being over-critical of Sprint, yet hinting that Sprint has got part of the formula right.  Not bashing Sprint, acknowledging that they have a better strategy than the duopoly, AT&T and Verizon. Is this the message T-Mobile tried to disguise when addressing their investors and those interested in investing in the sector? What are your thoughts?

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

T-Mobile - UNcarrier Phase 3 - Want to know more?

T-Mobile's John Legere has been nothing but inspiring, engaging, and non-conforming, all the while, forcing the competition, #theothers, as he so tenderly called them in the latest tweet, to change course, all to the benefit of all wireless customers in the USA.  He has been doing this through a campaign to UNcarrier-ize T-Mobile and make it a company that is nothing like you would recognize in today's marketplace, when most companies are looking to rape your wallet while giving you pennies of service.

2 days after his anniversary as the new CEO of T-Mobile, John Legere is expected to shed light on new details to a group of investors at Goldman Sachs.  You can watch the unveiling of more details having to do with Magenta's upcoming moves to, well, move more people to the UNcarrier.  The event will happen at 8:50am ET. You can follow all of the action and news from CellPhonius by following my Twitter handle: maestroalvarez as well as my Google Plus account, Danny Alvarez.  For a recount of all of the details, you can tune into my YouTube channel:

Don't forget to subscribe and poke around for more delicious wireless related content on my YouTube channel.  See you there!

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Smartphone Photographers: What is better, 9.6MP or 13MP?

Many of you might not know that the Galaxy S4, while boasting a very competitively spec'd 13MP camera, does not come set to take 13MP pictures.  That's right.  When taking those first crisp, awe-inspiring pictures on your new Samsung Galaxy phone, you may not know that you are not using the camera to its fullest potential.  That is, you are NOT taking 13MP shots.  More megapixels directly translates to more data (information) on the picture.  

In fact, I was surprised to learn that many did not know that the Galaxy S4, for example, shipped set on 9.6 megapixels.  That is why, CellPhonius's own Danny Alvarez put out a video detailing the "secret setting", while not so much a secret as a hidden setting, since the phone advertises its 13MP powers.

I love the way fellow Android enthusiast, (I would call him an Androcrat) Christian put it:

"The point here is at 13mp (4:3) you're getting the same width but less height then 9.6mp (16:9). So at first glance 9.6 will seem better because it better fits your S4's screen as it will your HDTV. The catch would be that you could still shoot your photos in the 13mp mode and get more scenery (like the sky and ground) and still later crop it to the exact same photo you would have got in the 9.6mp mode. You shoot your photos in 9.6mp originally and there is no adding what is cropped back. One more pro shooting 13mp photos is most printed photos are in the 4:3 ratio. The type that go in frames.

If you had shot in 9.6mp originally not only would you be cropping scenery right off the bat from the top and the bottom of the photo, but if you wanted a print that'll fit a standard frame, you'd then have to crop even more of the photo on the sides to get it back to 4:3. 

The only cons would be that 13mp shooting is going to take up slightly more space per photo and not fit your phones screen fully unless cropped or zoomed in. The option is totally a matter of option but I would take the latter. We only live once and I don't want to miss a thing!  Hope this helps all those trying to decide which mode they should use!" - credit: AndroidCentral

Another Android user said:

"I'd go for the 4:3 aspect ratio because it captures more of the image. This thing takes great pictures, but the area that is covered is dismal; you have to stand very far from a scene to get it all into the picture. 16:9 makes that even worse as it 'zooms in', and you'd have to stand even farther away." -credit: AndroidCentral

When all is said and done, it is all about preference.  Samsung might have assumed that you prefer the snappier setting at 9.6, given the complexity and size of their skin which gives you the Galaxy experience of Android.  To many, thought, capturing more information, thus, clearer pictures is key to finally letting go of their point-and-shoot cameras, allowing their new smartphone take their place.

I'm interested in knowing what your thoughts are on the subject.  Don't forget to follow me on YouTube, just type in CellPhonius in quotation marks and you'll find all of my videos on all things wireless.  You can also follow me on Twitter: @maestroalvarez and on Google Plus +Danny Alvarez